Sample preparation in AFM for soft materials and life science
Introduction
During the last 15 years, atomic force microscopy (AFM) has found
its way from material science of hard matter to the field of biology
and biomolecule research. Being a surface imaging technique it sometimes
has been called "unnatural" because it looks onto biomolecules
adsorbed to surfaces instead of looking at molecules in solution.
The answer was published in [1 ] and [21]: "However, living
systems are filled with surfaces, especially membranes, so surfaces
are arguably more relevant biologically than test tubes. In fact,
AFM may be a leading technique in a new field, surface biology,
which will grow in this century." "[
], 'Surface
Biology' may well be a new biological frontier, replacing the 'test
tube biology' that has generated such a vast amount of valuable
knowledge in the last century."
|
|
|
[1] Surface biology of DNA by atomic force microscopy.
Hansma, HG.
Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 52 (2001) 71-92.
[21] Probing biopolymers with the atomic force
microscope: A review. Hansma, HG, Pietrasanta, LI, Auerbach, ID,
Sorenson, C, Golan, R, Holden, PA.
|
|
The 72 page review article published in 1996 by Shao [17] gives
a first insight into the requirements for sample preparation in
AFM:
"It is clear that the major impediment to successful AFM
imaging of biological materials is sample preparation. This is
a particularly difficult issue as every sample requires a unique
approach. The objective with any sample is to achieve a firm adhesion
to a substrate of sufficiently minimal topography that the topography
of the sample is easily discriminated. This fixing to the surface
is to guarantee that the probe tip does not push the sample around
during imaging."
back to top
|
[17] Biological atomic force microscopy: what
is achieved and what is needed.
Shao, Z, Mou, J, Czajkowsky, DM, Yang, J, Yuan, J-Y.
Advances in Physics 45 (1996) 1-86.
|
|
Substrates
Since AFM does not require the substrate to be conductive, the
choice of substrates is almost unlimited. Both glass cover slips
and cleaved mica sheets have been used to adsorb various macromolecules
and organelles with varying degrees of success. However, the functionality
of the adsorbed macromolecules on these surfaces has not been
characterized by biochemical experiments. Within the resolution
achieved by AFM so far, structural changes have not been observed
when compared with that obtained by electron microscopy. Imaging
of living cells in buffer solutions did not appear to affect the
integrity of the cells either. This, of course, does not imply
that structural changes at higher resolutions can be entirely
ruled out, nor that the function of theses molecules is not in
some way affected. Detailed comparison with X-ray structures or
cryo-electron microscopy should be invaluable in addressing this
question. [17]
|
[17] Biological atomic force microscopy: what
is achieved and what is needed.
Shao, Z, Mou, J, Czajkowsky, DM, Yang, J, Yuan, J-Y.
Advances in Physics 45 (1996) 1-86.
|
|
Today, a number of specimen supports are used, among which the
most important are epitaxially grown gold films, layered transition
metal dichalcogenides, amorphous thin films, glass, silicon and
mica. The support used depends on the specimens and on how they
are to be immobilized: by physisorption, covalent bonding, self-assembly
on van der Waals surfaces or the Langmuir-Blodgett technique.
In the following, frequently used specimen supports and the most
important immobilization techniques are described.[4]
Many sample preparation techniques used for AFM are derived from
sample preparation in electron and light microscopy. For example
samples are prepared on glass slides for light microscopy or on
iron stubs used for electron microscopy. In 1968 Kleinschmidt
[18] published a method for DNA preparation, long time before
the AFM was invented and which today is still in use. The basics
about substrates used for AFM sample preparation are described
in [4]:
|
[4] Sample preparation techniques in scanning
probe microscopy.
Amrein, M, Müller, DJ.
Nanobiology 4 (1999) 229-256.
|
"All surfaces become
immediately covered with hydrocarbons when exposed to ambient air.
Even bidistilled water can be a source of organic contaminants.
A layer of these hydrocarbons on the sample or the probe can be
most disturbing for the AFM. As a result, the sample supports should
be prepared or activated immediately before use. Ultrapure water
should be used to prepare all buffer and rinsing solutions. Since
it contains fewer hydrocarbons and macroscopic contaminants than
conventional bidis-tilled water, it is less likely to influence
the imaging procedure by either damaging the probe or contaminating
the specimen being scanned. Organic contamination layers can be
removed from the probes and the specimen supports by exposure to
plasma or to UV light."
back to top |
|
|
Substrates: preferences
The biopolymers to be imaged in the AFM are normally dissolved
in aqueous solution and then deposited onto the substrate. Compared
with the size of the sample molecule the substrate has to be flat
and easy to prepare.
back to top
|
|
|
Mica
da Silva and Kindt described the properties of mica in [3, 20]:
The most commonly used substrate is mica. Mica is a non-conducting
layered material. It is cheap and can easily be cleaved, usually
with a pin or sometimes cellotape, to produce clean, atomically
flat surfaces up to even millimetres in size. The commonest form
of mica is Muscovite KAl2(OH)2AlSi3O10. The minimum step size
which can be observed on the surface is the sickness of an individual
layer (1 nm) and the hexagonal lattice constant within the layers,
which can be used for calibration, is 0.52 nm." "The
root-mean-square roughness is 0.06 ± 0.01 nm." [3]
"Mica has been successfully used in numberless studies especially
for AFM imaging of double stranded DNA and DNA-protein complexes,
protein arrays, and densely packed proteins. Although the mechanism
by which macromolecules absorb to this substrate still remains
poorly understood, a large number of protein samples adhere tightly
to this surface." [20]
|
[3] Biological probe microscopy in aqueous fluids.
Kindt, JH et al. In Jena, BP & Hörber, HJK. Atomic
force microscopy in cell biology. Academic press, San Diego,
London, 2002.
[20] Atomic force microscopy and proteins.
da Silva, LP.
Protein and Peptide Letters. 9 (2002)117-125.
|
|
Mica's property to be highly charged at the surface leads to
the fact that it is always covered with a thin (0.5 nm) layer
of water when exposed to ambient air. This water layer leads to
a continuous adhesion between AFM tip and sample.
Despite the widespread use of these substrates, the mechanism
of adsorption is not well understood. For both glass and mica
in aqueous media, it is known that positive ions tend to dissociate
from the surface to make them negatively charged. It is also known
that most protein surfaces contain both positively and negatively
charged residues at neutral pH and that the neutrality can be
altered by changing the pH of the buffer solution. For example,
ferritin has an isoelectric point of about 5 and is positively
charged at pH < 5 and negatively charged at pH > 5. Therefore
it seems plausible to assume that electrostatic interaction is
primarily responsible for adsorption. However, we must also realize
that most of these charged groups are shielded by counter-ions
in solution. It is not clear whether it is the direct interaction
between the oppositely charged groups o the salt bridges between
like charged groups that is responsible for surface adsorption
in each case. [17]
back to top
|
[17] Biological atomic force microscopy: what
is achieved and what is needed.
Shao, Z, Mou, J, Czajkowsky, DM, Yang, J, Yuan, J-Y.
Advances in Physics 45 (1996) 1-86.
|
|
Glass
Glass is flat enough for imaging cells or other large and relatively
high samples. Apart from cells, also large molecules like tubulin
molecules, chromosomes or cell organels. On the other hand glass
is generally too rough for reliable visualization of DNA, especially
under fluid.[3]
For preparation of AFM samples on glass coverslips, the round
ones with a diameter of 25 mm and a thickness of 0.17 mm are widely
used. Also the square cover slides are easily obtainable. Amrein
describes a method for cleaning glass in [4]: "The slides can
be used either unmodified or altered to change their physisorption
or chemical properties. The surface can be almost featureless
on the scale of macromolecular specimens. They are best suited
for all experiments in which visible light is transmitted across
the sample, as in scanning near field optical microscopy (SNOM)
or in the combined light- microscopy and SPM. […] Before use,
organic contaminants, dust or other particles are removed by washing
on time with concentrated HCl/HNO3 (3:1 v/v) and 5 times for 1
min with Millipore water in an ultrasonic bath (50 kHz). This
process makes the coverslips clean and smooth (rms-roughness ~
0.5 nm). They show a mottled background with less than one particle/µm2
(particle size ~ 0.3 µm2).
back to top
|
[3] Biological probe microscopy in aqueous fluids.
Kindt, JH et al. In Jena, BP & Hörber, HJK. Atomic
force microscopy in cell biology. Academic press, San Diego,
London, 2002.
[4] Sample preparation techniques in scanning
probe microscopy.
Amrein, M, Müller, DJ.
Nanobiology 4 (1999) 229-256.
|
|
Glass cleaning
Using glass as a solid support in AFM experiments it requires
cleaning. In [11] two glass cleaning methods are recommended:
Method 1
- rinse with ultrapure (Milli-Q) water several times
- rinse with ethanol
- rinse with Milli-Q- water
- air plasma treatment for 20 min
- dry in a nitrogen flow
- additional treatment in the plasma cleaner increases the
charge density on the surface.
Method 2
Precleaning with detergent
- glass is pre-cleaned with commercial detergent
- rinse with Milli-Q water
Removal of organic contamination
- incubation for 5-10 min. in RCA1 solution at 70 deg C. RCA1
solution is a mixture of Milli-Q, ammonia (25%), hydrogenperoxide
(30%) in 5:1:1 ratio.
- thoroughly rinse with Milli-Q water
Removal of inorganic contamination
- incubation for 5-10 min in RCA2 solution at 70 deg C.
RCA2 solution is a mixture of Milli-Q, hydrochloric acid (37%),
hydrogenperoxide (30%) in 5:1:1 ratio.
- thoroughly rinse with Milli-Q-water
- dry in nitrogen flow
back to top |
[11] Rasterkraftmikroskopische Untersuchungen von natürlichen
und künstlichen Lipidmembranen und daran gebundener Proteine.
Eschrich, R. Thesis. Technische Universität München
1998.
|
|
Gold
The properties of gold surfaces used for AFM sample preparation
are described in [4 ]:
Gold surfaces can be easily prepared by vapor deposition onto
glass and mica. Gold is chemically inert against oxygen and stable
against radicals. It binds organic thiols or bifunctional disulfides
with high affinity, which can be used to covalently attach biological
macromolecules.
back to top
|
[4] Sample preparation techniques in scanning probe microscopy.
Amrein, M, Müller, DJ.
Nanobiology 4 (1999) 229-256.
|
|
Epitaxially grown gold surface Au(111)
Special preparation techniques deliver ultraflat gold surfaces
as described in [17] and [5]: "For epitaxially grown gold surfaces,
atomically flat areas of up to several micrometers can be found
and the surface is hydrophilic if clean." "Ultraflat Au(111) surfaces
have a mean roughness of 0.2-0.5 nm over areas larger than 25
µm2. "
back to top
Silicon
Also parts of silicon wafers used in semiconductor industry can
be used as substrate. They have a thin oxide layer on their surface
which makes them hydrophilic because of the OH groups on the surface.
[17]
back to top
|
[5] Immobilization of native biomolecules onto Au(111) via N-hydroxysuccinimide
ester functionalized self-assembly monolayers for scanning probe
microscopy. Wagner, P, Hegner, M, Kernen, P, Zaugg, F, Semenza,
G. Biophys. J. 70 (1996) 2052-2066.
[17] Biological atomic force microscopy: what
is achieved and what is needed.
Shao, Z, Mou, J, Czajkowsky, DM, Yang, J, Yuan, J-Y.
Advances in Physics 45 (1996) 1-86.
|
|
Graphite - HOPG
HOPG is not widely spread among AFM sample techniques. Its chemical
properties and its disadvantages are described in [4] and [5]:
The sheets were of HOPG were flat on an atomic scale over areas
of microns. They were also well conductive, which was a prerequisite
for STM. However, the adsorption of most biological specimens
was very poor. Moreover, defects and the fine structure of step
edges of pure graphite were very misleading, since they often
resembled the expected structure of the specimen. Graphite is
now used exclusively as a support for the investigation of self-assembly
monolayers of organic molecules. " [4] "Furthermore,
HOPG bind macromolecules by way of weak electrostatic or "adsorption"
forces, and, moreover, it has fallen into, perhaps excessive disrepute
when it was shown to yield artifactual images mimicking DNA [in
STM investigations]." [5 ]
back to top
|
[4] Sample preparation techniques in scanning probe microscopy.
Amrein, M, Müller, DJ.
Nanobiology 4 (1999) 229-256.
[5] Immobilization of native biomolecules onto
Au(111) via N-hydroxysuccinimide ester functionalized self-assembly
monolayers for scanning probe microscopy. Wagner, P, Hegner, M,
Kernen, P, Zaugg, F, Semenza, G. Biophys. J. 70 (1996)
2052-2066.
|
|
Thermanox
A rough polymer like Thermanox is only suitable for AFM imaging
of large structures like cells as described in [11]. Thermanox
is hydrophobic and available from different distributors [11].
back to top
|
[11] Rasterkraftmikroskopische Untersuchungen von natürlichen
und künstlichen Lipidmembranen und daran gebundener Proteine.
Eschrich, R. Thesis. Technische Universität München
1998.
|
|
Functionalized surfaces
To strengthen further the adsorption, functionalized surfaces
can be introduced. The simplest method is to treat the surface
with certain molecules, such as poly-L-lysine or poly-L-arginine
(van Holde: Chromatin, 1989), in order to change the charge characteristics
of the surface. Therefore the adsorption can be enhanced or modified.
One step further is to introduce cross-linking groups to the surface.
So far, several schemes have been used for AFM imaging in solution.
One method is based on silanizing a solid surface with 3-aminopropyltriethoxysilane
(APTES) (Lyubchenko, 1992, 1993), which protonates at neutral
pH. The silane group in APTES is highly reactive and silanizes
the surface by forming covalent bonds with surface atoms. Karrasch
and co-workers introduced another cross-linking group at the amino
end of APTES on a glass surface, N-5-azido2-nitrobenzoyloxysuccinimide
(ANB-NOS) [10]. The azide group, upon ultraviolet irradiation,
can make non-specific covalent bonds to proteins on contact. Since
the functionalized surface becomes hydrophobic, and soluble proteins
do not come close enough to be cross-linked, a squeezing pressure
of 10-500 atm must be used to force macromolecules to come within
reach of the azide group. In another method, an ultraflat Au(111)
surface is used as a substrate for N-hydroxysuccinimide terminated
self-assembled monolayers of dithio-bis(succinidylundecanoate).
This monolayer readily reacts with amino groups, covalently linking
the protein to the substrate." [17]
back to top
|
[10] Covalent binding of biological samples to
solid supports for scanning probe microscopy in buffer solution.
Karrasch, S, Dolder, M, Schabert, F, Ramsden, J, Engel, A.
Biophys. J. 65 (1993) 2437-2446.
[17] Biological atomic force microscopy: what
is achieved and what is needed.
Shao, Z, Mou, J, Czajkowsky, DM, Yang, J, Yuan, J-Y.
Advances in Physics 45 (1996) 1-86.
|
|
Silanized surfaces - the APTES method
AP-Mica has amino groups exposed to the surface. Aliphatic amino
groups have a pK of approximately 10.6. Although the close packing
of the aliphatic amino groups on the AP-mica surface decreases
the pK, the surface will still be positively charged in solution
at neutral pH. [8]
back to top
|
[8] Adsorption of DNA to mica, silylated mica, and minerals: Characterization
by atomic force microscopy.
Bezanilla, M, Manne, S, Laney, DE, Lyubchenko, YL, Hansma, HG.
Langmuir 11 (1995) 655-659.
|
|
AP glass
The method for APTES coated glass is described in [10]:
"Silanization and derivatization of coverslips were carried
out in Petri dishes that had been washed in "piranha bath"
(3.5 % H2O2 in 18 M H2SO4), followed by rinsing with water and
acetone. The following steps were carried out at room temperature
unless stated otherwise. Coverslips were washed once with concentrated
HCl/HNO3 (3:1) and five times for 1 min with destilled water in
an ultrasonic bath (50 kHz). They were etched with trifluoroacetic
acid for 90 min and stored in vacuum over solid KOH for at least
10 h. Coverslips were then silanized with APTES (2 % in 95 % aqueous
acetone) for 3 min followed by washing with acetone (12 times,
5 min each) [
]. Curing of the silane linkages was carried
out in an oven at 110 °C for 1 h. " [10]
|
[10] Covalent binding of biological samples to
solid supports for scanning probe microscopy in buffer solution.
Karrasch, S, Dolder, M, Schabert, F, Ramsden, J, Engel, A.
Biophys. J. 65 (1993) 2437-2446.
|
 |
3-aminopropyltriethoxysilane APTES
|
 |
3'-glycidoxypropyltrimenthoxysilane GOPS
|
 |
1-(3-Aminopropyl)silatrane APS
|
 |
ANB-NOS
N-5-azido2-nitrobenzoyloxysuccinimide
|

|
Schematic reaction diagram of an APTES coated surface
with crosslinker ANB-NOS. After [10].
|
back to top |
|
|
AP-silicon
Möller et al. [6] described a modified protocol for the APTES
method: "The [ silicon] chips were immersed for 15 min in
1 % APTES solution in 95 % acetone/water. Afterwards, the chips
were washed five times (5 min each) with acetone and dried for
45 min at 110 °C. They were then incubated for 2 h with a
solution 0.2 % 1,4-phenylenediisothiocyanate in 10 % pyridine/dimethyl
formamide and washed with methanol and acetone. The activated
chips may be stored in a vacuum desiccator containing anhydrous
calcium chloride for a longer time without discernible loss of
activity."
Möller's et al. modified procedure for the GOPS method is:
"For substrate modification with 3'-glycidoxypropyl-trimethoxysilane
(GOPS) the slides were suspended in dry toluene containing 1%
silane at 80° C for 4-6 h, using a modified procedure from
the literature [7]."
back to top
|
[6] DNA probes on chip surfaces studied by scanning
force microscopy using specific binding of colloidal gold.
Möller, R. Andrea Csáki, Köhler, M, Fritzsche,
W. Nucleic Acids Research 28 (2000) 1-5.
[7] Direct detection of nucleic acid hybridization
on the surface of a charge coupled device. Lamture, JB, Beattie,
KL, Burke, BE, Eggers, MD, Ehrlich, DJ, Fowler, R, Hollies, MA,
Kosicki, BB, Reich, RK, Smith, SR, Varma, RS, Hogan, ME. Nucleic
Acids Res. 22 (1994) 2121-2125.
|
| AP-mica
|
|
Method
1
"AP-mica was prepared by placing freshly cleaved mica in a
2 L glass desiccator which contained 30-100 µL of 3-aminopropyl-triethoxysilane
(APTES), 98 %, for 2 h. The AP-mica was then removed and stored
under argon prior to making the samples. The best AP-mica surfaces
were prepared with 30 µL of APTES that had been redistilled
in vacuum and stored under argon; the silylation was also done under
argon. [
] AP-mica has a shelf life of approximately 1 month
and has a more hydrophobic surface than bare mica, presumably due
to the propyl chains that are attached to the surface amino groups."
[8] |
[8] Adsorption of DNA to mica, silylated mica, and minerals: Characterization
by atomic force microscopy.
Bezanilla, M, Manne, S, Laney, DE, Lyubchenko, YL, Hansma, HG.
Langmuir 11 (1995) 655-659.
|
Method
2
" A desiccator was purged with argon for 2 min and 30 µL of
APTES (99%, Sigma-Aldrich) placed into a small container at the
bottom of the desiccator. Ten microliters of N,N-diisopropylamine
(99%, destilled, Sigma-Aldrich) was placed into another small container,
and the desiccator purged with argon for a further 2 min. Mica sheets
were stripped on one side until smooth and immediately placed into
the desiccator. The desiccator was purged for another 3 min and
then sealed off, leaving the mica exposed to APTES vapor for times
that were varied between 30 min and 2 h (there appeared to be no
consistent effect of exposure time within this range). After this
exposure, the APTES was removed, the desiccator purged, and the
treated mica (AP-mica) stored in the sealed desiccator until needed.
APTES was used both as received and as redistilled. Distillation
was found to have no effect unless the as-received material was
older than ~ 2 months or had been exposed to ambient air for some
hours.” [22]
back to top
|
[22] Glutaraldehyde modified mica: a new surface for atomic force
microscopy of chromatin. Wang, H., Bash, R., Yodh, J.G., Hager,
G.L., Lohr, D., Lindsay, S.M. Biophys. J. 83 (2002) 3619-3625.
|
|
ANB-NOS modified surfaces
"All subsequent steps were performed in the darkroom using
red safety light. The reaction of the NH2 groups with the succinimide
ester group of ANB-NOS was carried out in 0.1 M Na2CO3, pH 9.0.
The reaction mixture was prepared by adding 10 nmol ANB-NOS/cm2
glass surface dissolved in 1 ml dioxane to 20 ml Na2CO3 solution.
This corresponds to a 10-fold molar excess of the photocross-linker
with respect to the amino groups. The coverslips were incubated
for 4 h. Excess reagent was then removed by washing the coverslips
three times with distilled water, and two times with acetone.
Coverslips were stored under vacuum and handled in the dark."
[10]
|
[10] Covalent binding of biological samples to solid supports
for scanning probe microscopy in buffer solution.
Karrasch, S, Dolder, M, Schabert, F, Ramsden, J, Engel, A.
Biophys. J. 65 (1993) 2437-2446.
|
|
A yet more detailed method was described by Liu [24] :
As described by Karrash, APTES-coated coverslips were immersed
in 0.1 M Na2CO3 (1 mL dioxane to 20 mL of Na2CO3 solution, pH
9.0) containing 3 µmol ANBNOS for at least 4 h. The concentration
of ANBNOS was thus at least tenfold molar excess with respect
to the amino groups of APTES on the coverslip (approx. 1 nmol
NH2 groups/cm2). ANBNOS reacts with the exposed amino end of APTES
and covalently binds to the coverslip surface [
]. Excess
ANBNOS was removed by washing the coverslip with gentle pipet
squirting 3 times with 1 % n-butylamine in 0.1 M Na2CO3, 3 times
with 0.1 M Na2CO3, 2 times with deionised water, and 2 times with
acetone. Air-dried coverslips were stored in a vacuum-sealed desiccator
and handled in the dark. [24]
back to top
|
[24] Sample preparation and imaging of erythrocyte
cytoskeleton with the atomic force microscopy.
Liu, F, Burgess, J, Mizukami, H, Ostafin, A.
Cell Biochem.Biophys. 38 (2003) 251-270.
|
| Silanized
surfaces - the APS method |
|
|
APS-mica
"Unlike the (3-aminopropyl)triethoxysilane (APTES) commonly
used for silica surface modifications, 1-(3-aminopropyl)silatrane
(APS) is not very reactive and is extremely resistant to hydrolysis
and polymerisation at neutral pH. " [9]
APS synthesis:
1-(3-Aminopropyl)silatrane was prepared by vacuum evaporation
of a mixture of 4.13 g of triethanolamine containing 1 mg of sodium
as a catalyst and 6.12 g of (3-aminopropyl)triethoxysilane at
60 °C to constant weight (6.4 g). The compound obtained by
this procedure can be used directly without purification for surface
modification. A 50 mM solution of APS in deionised water was used
as a stock solution. The stock was stored in refrigerator at 4
°C with no special precautions." [9]
"Preparation of APS mica for AFM: The APS stock solution
diluted 1: 300 in deionised water was used for APS-mica preparation.
Freshly cleaved mica strips of appropriate sizes were immersed
into APS working solution for 30 min, rinsed thoroughly with deionised
water, Ar dried and stored in Ar filled tubes." [9]
back to top
|
[9] Silatrane-based surface chemistry for immobilization
of DNA, protein-DNA complexes and other biological materials.
Shlyakhtenko, LS, Gall, AA, Filonov, A, Cerovac, Z, Lushnikov,
A, Lyubchenko, YL.
Ultramicroscopy 97 (2003) 279-287.
|
|
Immobilization on poly-L-lysine-coated surface
Poly-L-lysine is a positively charged polymer with adsorbs very
well to negatively charged glass or silicon dioxide leading to
positively charged surfaces.
"Acid-washed coverslips were coated with a poly-L-lysine
solution (10 mg/mL ; Mr 1000-4000), washed with water after 1
min and dried in air. The protein solution (3 mg/mL) was deposited
on the dry surface and washed off after 15 min." [10]
back to top
|
[10] Covalent binding of biological samples to
solid supports for scanning probe microscopy in buffer solution.
Karrasch, S, Dolder, M, Schabert, F, Ramsden, J, Engel, A.
Biophys. J. 65 (1993) 2437-2446.
|
|
Hydrophobic /hydrophilic surfaces
"For AFM in solution, hydrophobic surfaces do not appear
to be a very useful substrate, not only because many proteins
could denature upon contact with a hydrophobic surface, but also
because the Si3N4 tip interacts strongly with a hydrophobic surface,
resulting in a noticeable adhesion force in solution. The exact
nature of these interactions is not fully understood, and reliable
results cannot be obtained. However, for AFM in air, hydrophobic
surfaces can be adequate, and sometimes superior. For example,
carbon-coated mica was shown to be a good substrate for imaging
DNA with a very good lateral resolution and specimen stability.
One problem with a hydrophilic surface in air is that a thin layer
of water will be condensed onto the surface for medium to high
humidity. This condensed water can interact with the tip giving
rise to a quite large adhesion force (capillary force) and can
reduce the stability of adsorbed macromolecules. " [17]
back to top
|
[17] Biological atomic force microscopy: what
is achieved and what is needed.
Shao, Z, Mou, J, Czajkowsky, DM, Yang, J, Yuan, J-Y.
Advances in Physics 45 (1996) 1-86.
|
| Glass
Hydrophobization |
|
Method
1 - Silanization with dichlorodimethylsilane
The method for silanization of glass is described in [11]:
"A freshly cleaned cover slip is incubated in dichlorodimethylsilane
vapor (CH3)2SiCl2 for 3 seconds up to 5 minutes. It is sufficient
to place the surface over the mouth of a bottle with the silane.
Afterwards the surface is washed with ethanol. The silanized surface
has a higher roughness than the pure glass." [11 ] |
[11] Rasterkraftmikroskopische Untersuchungen
von natürlichen und künstlichen Lipidmembranen und daran
gebundener Proteine.
Eschrich, R. Thesis. Technische Universität München
1998.
|
|
Method 2 - Silanization with n-octadecyltrimethoxysilane
"n-octadecyltrimethoxysilane (Gelest or United Chemical),
methanol (Optima Grade, Fisher), and heptane (Optima Grade, Fisher)
were used as received. Water was deionized, distilled over quartz,
and filtered by a Milli-Q reagent water system (Millipore Co.),
which resulted in a resistivity of 18 MΩ*cm.
Glass microscope slides (Fisher Scientific; rms surface roughness
measured by AFM was 1.5 (0.2 Å) were soaked in concentrated
NH4OH for 1 h and washed 5 times by ultrasonication in 18 MΩ*cm
water. The surfaces were then dried for 1 h at 140 °C and
placed directly in methanol to keep the surface free from water
vapor and other unwanted adsorbates. Glass surfaces and SiO2-coated
cantilevers were silanized by immersion in a 5 mM silane solution
in heptane for 24 h. The silanized surfaces were washed 3 times
with heptane to remove unreacted silane materials. The treated
surfaces were then heated for 1 h at 70 °C. After being coated,
they were rinsed with acetone to remove any unreacted silane and
then stored in methanol until used." [23]
|
[23] Single-molecule bond-rupture force analysis
of interactions between AFM tips and substrates modified with
organosilanes.
Wenzler, L.A., Moyes, G. L., Olson, L. G., Harris, J. M., and
Beebe, Jr, T. P.
Anal. Chem. 69 (1997) 2855-2861.
|
 |
n-octadecyltrimethoxysilane |
back to top
|
|
|
N-Hydroxysuccinimide ester functionalization
"The approach is based on the ex-situ synthesis of dithiobis(succinimidyl-undecanoate)
DSU providing a long-chain N-hydroxysuccinimide-ester functionalized
dialkyldisulfide, which is accessible for nucleophilic attack
(e.g. amide bond formation with amino-group- containing molecules)."
[12 ]
|
|

 |
[12] Omega-functionalized self-assembled monolayers
chemisorbed on ultraflat Au(111) surfaces for biological scanning
probe microscopy in aqueous buffers. Wagner, P, Zaugg, F, Kernen,
P, Hegner, M, Semenza, G.
J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B 14 (1996) 1466-1471.
|
|
Synthesis and self-assembly of DSU dithiobis(succinimidylundecanoate)
[after 5]
|
|
Synthesis of 3
"Sodium thiosulfate (55.3 g, 350 mmol) was added to a suspension
of 11-bromo-undecanoic acid 1 (92.8 g, 350 mmol) in 50 % aqueous
1,4-dioxane (1000 ml). The mixture was heated at reflux (90 °C)
for 2 h until the reaction to the intermediate Bunte salt 2 was
complete (clear solution). The oxidation to the corresponding
disulfide was carried out in situ by addin iodine in portions
until the reaction retitrated with 15 % sodium pyrosulfite in
water. After removal of 1,4 dioxane by rotary evaporation the
creamy acetate/tetrahydrofuran (THF) provided 3 as a white solid
(73.4 g, 96.5 %): mp 94 °C." [5]
Synthesis of 4
"To a solution of 3 (1.0 g, 2.3 mmol) in THF (50 ml) was
added N-hydroxysuccinimide (0.575 g, 5 mmol) followed by dicyclohexylcarbodiimide
(DCC, 1.03 g, 5 mmol) at 0 °C. After the reaction mixture
was allowed to warm to 23 °C and was stirred for 36 h at room
temperature, the dicyclohexylurea (DCU) was filtered. Removal
of the solvent under reduced pressure and recrystallization from
acetone/hexane provided 4 as a white solid. Final purification
was achieved by medium-pressure liquid chromatography (9 bar)
using silica gel and a 2:1 mixture of ethyl acetate and hexane.
The organic phase was concentrated and dried in vacuum to yield
4 (1.12 g, 78 %): mp 95 °C." [5].
back to top
|
[5] Immobilization of native biomolecules onto Au(111) via N-hydroxysuccinimide
ester functionalized self-assembly monolayers for scanning probe
microscopy. Wagner, P, Hegner, M, Kernen, P, Zaugg, F, Semenza,
G. Biophys. J. 70 (1996) 2052-2066.
|
|
Preparation of ultraflat gold
The preparation of ultraflat gold is described in [5]:
"[
] gold was evaporated onto mica and glued upside
down to a silicon wafer or glass coverslip; the mica was then
removed by soaking in tetrahydrofuran. These "template-stripped"
gold surfaces (TSG) consisted, therefore, of the gold atom layer
that had been deposited on the mica template first."
More detailed instructions for the preparation of ultraflat gold
are described in [13],[14], [15] .
back to top
Adhesive tape
Commercially available adhesive tape can be used for immobilization
of powders or even biological samples. First a strip of tape is
superglued with its uncovered side to a microscope glass slide.
When an inorganic powder has to be imaged it is trickled onto
the glue side of the tape and the supernatant is removed with
a stream of pure nitrogen.
Also red blood cells have been successfully immobilized from suspensions.
In this case the suspension has been poured onto the tape. After
a short incubation time of some minutes the cells adhered. In
our lab, red blood cells and polyelectrolyte shells could be successfully
adsorbed onto adhesive tape, even in aqueous solution.
back to top
|
[13] Ultralarge atomically flat template-stripped
Au surfaces for scanning probe microscopy. Hegner, M, Wagner,
P, Semenza, G. Surf. Sci. 291 (1993) 39-46.
[14] Formation and in situ modification of monolayers
chemisorbed on ultraflat template-stripped gold surfaces. Wagner,
P, Hegner, M, Güntherodt, H-J, Semenza, G. Langmuir 11
(1995) 3867-3875.
[15] Procedures in scanning probe microscopy.
Hegner, M, Wagner, P. Ultraflat Au surfaces. In: Colton, RJ, et
al. (ed.) John Wiley 1998. ISBN 047195912X
|
|
Superglue
A drop of superglue is dabbed onto a glass slide and smeared like
a blood smear. When an inorganic powder has to be imaged it is
trickled onto the glue and the supernatant is removed with a stream
of pure nitrogen after drying.
Note: Superglue cannot be used when AFM experiment is performed
in aqueous environment.
back to top
|
|
|
Binding of biological molecules to a solid
substrate
Karrasch et al. [10] published a method to covalently bind biomolecules
and supramolecular assemblies such as
- bacteriophage T4 polyheads
- eucariotic intermediate filaments
- HPI layer of deinococcus radiodurans
Their method is described as follows:
"For the covalent binding of samples to the modified glass
surface, the [APTES-ANBNOS-covered] coverslips were squeezed between
two glass disks (borosilicate safety sight glass; diameter = 12
cm, thickness = 2 cm) at a pressure of 100 to 5000 N/cm2 to bring
the hydrophilic biological structures into close contact with
the hydrophobic cross-linker. Covalent coupling of the samples
was induced by activating the azide with ultraviolet (UV) irradiation
at 366 nm (Sylvania F8T5) at a distance of 10 cm for 3 min. The
extent of the reaction was determined from the change in the absorption
band of ANB-NOS at 312 nm. Coverslips were rinsed thoroughly with
water to remove excess protein and stored in water or buffer.
" [10]
|
[10] Covalent binding of biological samples to solid supports
for scanning probe microscopy in buffer solution.
Karrasch, S, Dolder, M, Schabert, F, Ramsden, J, Engel, A.
Biophys. J. 65 (1993) 2437-2446.
|
Liu et al. bound a plant
lectin (E-PHA) to ANBNOS-coated glass coverslips [24] :
Ten microliters of E-PHA lectin (2 mg/mL in phosphate-buffered
saline [PBS] buffer: 145 mM NaCl and 5 mM NaH2PO4/Na2HPO4, pH at
7.4) were compressed between tow ANBNOS-coated glass coverslips
under irradiation at 302 nm (8 Watt) at 10 cm from the light source
for 3 min to bring the hydrophilic lectin in close contact with
the hydrophobic ANBNOS. Completion of light-activated crosslinking
was confirmed spectrophotometrically. The coverslips were rinsed
with PBS five times and stored in PBS [
]. [24]
back to top |
[24] Sample preparation and imaging of erythrocyte
cytoskeleton with the atomic force microscopy.
Liu, F, Burgess, J, Mizukami, H, Ostafin, A.
Cell Biochem.Biophys. 38 (2003) 251-270.
|
|
The Kleinschmidt method
For sample preparation in electron microscopy Kleinschmidt in
1968 [ ] published a monolayer transfer method:
"The DNA solution is spread on the surface of a water subphase.
The protein film, along with the adsorbed DNA molecules, is picked
up directly by the substrate." [16]
back to top
|
[16] Promises and problems of biological atomic force microscopy
(review). Yang, J., Tamm, L. K., Somlyo, AP, Shao Z. J. Microscopy
171 (1993) 183-198.
|
|
DNA adsorption to APTES mica
The method to adsorb double stranded DNA to an APTES modified
mica sheet is described in [19 ]:
"Modified mica strips were immersed into DNA in Tris/HCl
buffer (pH 7) (10 mM Tris/HCl, 10-20 mM NaCl, 5 mM EDTA) and incubated
at room temperature for between 1 and 2 h. Concentration of DNA
was varied between 0.01 and 0.1 µg/mL. λ-DNA and
HindIII fragments of λ-DNA were purchased from New England
BioLabs and used without additional purification. After the adsorption
stage had been completed, the samples were rinsed with deionized
water, blotted at the edge and vacuum-dried."
back to top
|
[19] Atomic force microscopy of long DNA: Imaging in air and under
water. Lyubchenko, Y, Shlyakhtenko, L, Harrington, R, Oden, P,
Lindsay, S. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 90 (1993) 2137-2140.
|
|
Protein adsorption
AFM has the potential to make unique contributions to the study
of (membrane) proteins, not only in generating nanometre resolution
structures, but also in studying structural changes under various
conditions.
For AFM, supported membranes have been shown to be most appropriate
for achieving high resolution. Unsupported membranes, such as
the plasma membrane in an intact cell, are too soft and easily
deformed under the AFM tip, preventing any high-resolution imaging.
So far, the best resolution achieved in solution on cell surfaces,
either fixed or native, is only in the range of several 10 nm,
which is insufficient to resolve membrane proteins and other membrane
structures. With supported membranes on mica or glass, the best
resolution is an order of magnitude higher, approaching subnanometre
in some cases. [17]
|
[17] Biological atomic force microscopy: what
is achieved and what is needed.
Shao, Z, Mou, J, Czajkowsky, DM, Yang, J, Yuan, J-Y.
Advances in Physics 45 (1996) 1-86.
|
| Protein adsorption is a
net result of various complex interactions between and within all
components, including the solid surface, the protein, the solvent
and any other solutes present. These interaction forces include
dipole and induced dipole moments, hydrogen bond forces and electrostatic
potentials. All these inter- and intramolecular forces will contribute
to a decrease of the Gibbs energy during absorption. [20] |
[20] Atomic force microscopy and proteins. da
Silva, LP. Protein and Peptide Letters. 9 (2002)117-125.
|
Resolution by AFM on proteins
is highest when the proteins are packed into 2-dimensional arrays.
The beautiful and extensive analyses of such protein arrays are
included in two recent reviews [Czajkowsky, Shao, Febs. Lett. 430
(1998) 51. Müller, Fotiadis, Engel, Febs. Lett. 430 (1998)
105.], which describe the detailed substructure of protein subunits
in these 2-dimensional arrays and the changes in substructure that
occur when the subunits are compressed by increasing the imaging
force. [21]
back to top
|
[21] Probing biopolymers with the atomic force
microscope: A review. Hansma, HG, Pietrasanta, LI, Auerbach, ID,
Sorenson, C, Golan, R, Holden, PA.
|
|
Substrate supported lipid membranes
For decades, the use of the Langmuir trough to transfer mono-
and bilayers of phospholipids, fatty acids or other amphiphilic
compounds onto glass, mica or silicon is well established. It
depends on the properties of the substrate surface, if it is hydrophilic
or hydrophobic, to influence the orientation of the molecular
layer(s). By this method, a surface coverage of nearly 100 % can
be achieved. [16]
back to top
|
[16] Promises and problems of biological atomic
force microscopy (review). Yang, J., Tamm, L. K., Somlyo, AP,
Shao Z. J. Microscopy 171 (1993) 183-198.
|
|
Sources of supply
Glass coverslips: Plano, W. Planet
GmbH, Marburg, Germany.
Plasma cleaner: Harrick Plasma cleaner
UV-lamp: Pen-ray lamp
Mica: Mica New York Corp. 75 Varick
Street, NY 10013.
PLL: Poly-L-lysine hydrobromide, Sigma
P0879, mol wt 1,000 to 4,000.
Dichlorodimethylsilane (CH3)2SiCl2:
Aldrich 44,027-2.
3-aminopropyltriethoxysilane: Aldrich
440140
1,4-phenylenediisothiocyanate C6H4(NCS)2:
Aldrich: 25,855-5
3'-glycidoxypropyltrimethoxysilane:
Power Chemical Corporation (www.powerchemical.net): PC3100
N-5-azido2-nitrobenzoyloxysuccinimide ANB-NOS:
Pierce Biotechnology, USA (www.piercenet.com) 21451, Apollo Scientific,
UK (www.apolloscientific.co.uk) BIPA110
Thermanox: Miles Scientific, Nunc
GmbH, Wiesbaden, Germany.
Dithiobis(succinimidyl-undecanoate) DSU:
Dojindo, Japan (www.dojindo.com): code D539.
11-Amino-1-undecanethiol, hydrochloride: Dojindo, Japan (www.dojindo.com):
code A 423.
back to top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|